Blog Layout

Philanthropy

ARI Group • November 10, 2023

Easier to give away money than earn it, isn't it? If this is a cause that speaks to you, use a tax credit if you are in a developed market or returning a favor here are quick key points to address through the due diligence process:


Program Efficiency Ratio:


This shows the percentage of total expenses that go directly to program services as opposed to administrative or fundraising costs. The typical benchmark is an 80/20 split between program and administrative expenses. This can vary based on the organization's size, mission, and operational model with sufficient funds are directed towards their core mission. Some prominent non-profits have 90% expense ratio the opposite of what it should be.


Fundraising Efficiency:


This ratio assesses the cost of raising funds. It's calculated by dividing fundraising expenses by the total income generated from fundraising. A lower ratio indicates more efficiency.


Cost per Unit of Service:


This metric calculates the cost involved in delivering a specific unit of service. It helps in understanding the direct financial impact of the services provided.

 

We don’t give much relevance the reliance ratio which measures the percentage of total income that comes from various sources like donations, grants, and earned income. The known rule of thumb is no income source should exceed 75% to ensure diversification and reduce risk per say. This should be contextually interpreted as risk perception is relative. Limited access to diverse funding sources, a higher reliance on a single source might be also create direct impact.


Realizations over dinner


As my teenage son, still grappling with the financial concepts of depreciation versus compounding, weighs the merits of investing in shares of Cava against the allure of the latest fancy sneakers, it serves as a humble reminder of the complex decisions that shape economies. This microcosm of choice reflects on Davos takeways, Global Events, and the capital markets eying China’s fiscal stimulus actions…


China's Fiscal Policy Over Decades


Policymakers in Beijing, have deployed about 2 trillion yuan ($278 billion) from the reserves of state-owned enterprises. This move aims to reinforce the stock market through the Hong Kong exchange link—a savvy use of international financial avenues to fortify domestic confidence. Furthermore, at least 300 billion yuan ($42 billion) from local funds is allocated to invest in mainland shares, a move designed to directly nurture the economic landscape. Collectively, this represents a substantial 2-3% of China's projected 2023 GDP, which stands at an imposing $17.5 trillion. To provide approximately $3 trillion contraction in market value witnessed over the past three years.


From the 1980s Onward


The 1980s marked the beginning of China's shift from a centrally planned economy to a market-driven one, with GDP burgeoning from $191.149 billion to $390.28 billion. This period of transformation was underscored by a series of reforms that decentralized economic control, spurred infrastructure investment, and invigorated rural development. It laid the cornerstone for a vibrant and diversified economic base that would define China's fiscal identity.


The 1990s witnessed China's real estate sector expansion, escalating from contributing 4-5% of the GDP in the late '90s to over 10% by the 2010s. This growth was facilitated by the 1994 tax-sharing system and a tactical response to the Asian Financial Crisis with a fiscal stimulus of approximately 2.6% of GDP. China's WTO accession and the booming of its export sector, growing from $18 billion in 1980 to an astronomical $2.5 trillion by the late 2010s. The 2008 Global Financial Crisis prompted a 4 trillion yuan stimulus package, equivalent to around 12.5% of GDP, which significantly underpinned growth in infrastructure and real estate.


The 2010s were characterized by a strategic pivot towards reducing overcapacity and managing debt, with a notable investment of over 33 billion yuan in EV subsidies between 2009 and 2017. This decade saw a concerted push towards a knowledge-driven economy, with technology and service sectors prominence.


The COVID-19 pandemic's fiscal response was marked by a 2.5 trillion-yuan stimulus package, emphasizing the importance of economic support for businesses and healthcare infrastructure. This was succeeded by continued fiscal support and infrastructure investment in 2021 or support for the US and Global Growth.


The fiscal narrative of 2022 and 2023 is sculpted by sustainable and digital economy investments, with increased fiscal incentives for high-tech sectors and substantial investments in high-tech aerospace credits. The introduction of reduced VAT for small taxpayers and a $72 billion EV tax credit in 2023. The silver economy, experience and travel incentives are on the agenda. These are the tip of the iceberg but just like SEO, we don’t see what the backlinks are. It is somehow puzzling to witness the power of capital markets, that the second biggest economy only represents single digit percent share of global traditional MSCI benchmarks.

January 20, 2025
Luxury brands epitomize exclusion, craftsmanship, and status. Ferrari and Hermes are the market leaders in high-end markets. This article provides an insight into investment dynamics from the two companies and their significant lessons to investors. Ferrari and Hermes' brand heritages are their main sources of comparability. Ferrari, established in 1939, is known for its high-performance sports cars, while Hermes, founded in 1837, is known for its luxury quality goods. High-end brand success is greatly dependent on a sense of exclusivity. Ferrari manufactures a few car units, allowing it to preserve demand and appreciation over time. The firm produces only a few models that guarantee profitability and loyalty over time. On the other hand, Hermes ensures that its products, such as the Birkin bag, remain highly exceptional. The company occasionally manufactures the bag, making it scarce and expensive. Ferrari and Hermes are highly considerate of demand and pricing dynamics. Ferrari balances production to meet demand and at the same time maintain exclusivity. The company further encourages its clients to personalize cars, reducing the likelihood of unsold cars. Hermes produces goods in small quantities, making them unique and unsellable. Unsold products are often destroyed to protect market exclusiveness by ensuring that their products never appear in sales or outlet stores. Market trends and consumer preference significantly influence market sales. Hermes is changing focus to sustainability to safeguard future markets. The firm can boast about its continued focus on quality and sustainability, hence retaining a steady market. Hermes has expanded to emerging markets while still focussing on sustainability. Ferrari and Hermes offer steady performance and are promising to investors. Ferrari thrives on limited production capacity, which guarantees profitability. Moreover, the company has adeptly innovated designs to tap hybrid and electric markets. Hermes uses pricing strategies and limited products to grow while expanding in developing economies. Investors ought to learn from the strategy and develop unique laws. Firm heritage and supply control are the primary lessons. Commanding premium prices and exclusivity is another chief mega law from the two. There is a need to focus on quality and personalization to attract customer loyalty. Luxury brands like Ferrari and Hermes provide insightful examples of how strategic business practices can drive success and create valuable investment opportunities. By leveraging their rich heritage, managing supply and pricing, and adapting to market trends, these companies have established themselves as leaders in the luxury market. For investors, the resilience and growth potential of Ferrari and Hermes offer compelling reasons to consider them as part of a diversified investment portfolio. As these brands continue to innovate and expand, they are poised to deliver sustained value for years to come. Moreover, the practice of destroying unsold inventory to prevent discounts and maintain exclusivity further underscores their commitment to preserving brand integrity. This, combined with their strategic supply control and pricing strategies, ensures that Ferrari and Hermes remain at the pinnacle of luxury, offering not just products but a promise of unparalleled quality and exclusivity.
Weight loss Healthcare
May 4, 2024
Explore the power of GLP-1s in transforming weight loss and health trends, driving growth in the wellness sector.
Scrabble tiles that say hear the joy in life
May 4, 2024
Check out how curated gifts can alleviate pandemic shopping fatigue and make your gifting easier and more meaningful.
An old computer is stacked on top of another computer
May 3, 2024
Dive into the importance of HBM3 technology and its role in advancing AI capabilities across various industries.
A close up of a colorful painting on a white background.
May 3, 2024
Uncover the latest challenges and advancements in AI search technology and how it’s shaping the future.
Two horses are running in a field in a black and white photo.
February 14, 2024
Check out the best ways how the conflitct between Russia-Ukraine is accelerating Western efforts in localizing semiconductor production.
A large cargo ship is docked in a harbor with a plane flying overhead.
October 17, 2023
Discover how the Russia-Ukraine war is accelerating Western efforts in localizing semiconductor production.
A white golf ball with the number 1 on it
By ARI Group July 12, 2023
Read this page to get to know how golf strategies can inspire better behaviour and decision-making in institutional investment.
Share by: